DOWNLOAD ONTSPORING DIEDERIK STAPEL

The research result, obtained by Stapel and co-workers Roos Vonk and Marcel Zeelenberg, that carnivores are more selfish than vegetarians , which was widely publicized in Dutch media, [25] was suspected and later turned out to be based on falsified data. You are commenting using your Google account. On 31 October , a committee entrusted with investigating "the extent and nature of the breach of scientific integrity committed by [Stapel]", [ This quote needs a citation ] formed by the Rector Magnificus of Tilburg University and chaired by Willem "Pim" Levelt , published an interim report regarding Stapel's activities at the three Dutch universities where he had worked. On 28 November , the joint final report, from the three investigating committees, was published. He also discusses Diederik Stapel. To what extent do the current academic incentives encourage researchers to make their findings look better than they are?

Uploader:	Goltigami
Date Added:	16 March 2014
File Size:	68.8 Mb
Operating Systems:	Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads:	49982
Price:	Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Some of his research was featured on news sites, such as his Science paper that found that people discriminate more in messy environments or another unpublished study that thinking about meat made people less social.

This site uses cookies. Nature Nature News Blog. Maybe he wanted to talk about it and get some friendly advice?

I also had no trouble with the results of the experiments. The interim report stated that Stapel had caused severe damage staprl young people at the beginning of their careers, as well as to the general confidence in science, in particular social psychology.

First of all, just like network security officers can learn a lot from computer hackers, everyone who wants to know how to improve the control mechanisms in science should devote a lot of attention to this book. He used his power and prestige in a very sophisticated way. In this way, he avoided further criminal prosecution. When I dieverik the results, the world had become logical again.

Diederik Stapel count rises again, to This was great, but at the same time it was very wrong. Archived from the original on 2 April The report advised that the degrees of the students involved should not be retracted.

Main menu Skip to content. Archived from the original on 22 February Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Deborah G. How disordered contexts promote stereotyping and discrimination. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. Archived from the original on 30 September I really, really wanted to be really, really good.

Diederik Stapel

Email required Address never made public. I was alone in my fancy office at University of Groningen. In the interest of transparency, we do not accept anonymous comments.

Cancel reply Enter your comment here Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here You are commenting using your Facebook account. Dutch media reported today that it will be called Ontsporing Derailmentlntsporing an apparent reference to Ontspoorde Wetenschap Derailed Sciencea recent book by Dutch journalist Frank van Kolfschooten in which Stapel features prominently.

Nederlandse Omroep Stichting in Dutch. That I was helping people.

Final Report: Stapel Affair Points to Bigger Problems in Social Psychology | Science | AAAS

I wanted to be published in the best journals and speak in the largest room at conferences. Stapel wrote Ontsporing in Dutch, but now his story has been translated into English, under the title of Faking Science — thanks to the efforts of Nick Brown. It depends on how you look at it: To any crime there is not just means and motive, but also opportunity.

If this is the only motivation, then we are certain to engage in practices to make this confirmation more likely.

The report also stqpel two professors who claim they had previously seen examples of Stapel's data that were "too good to be true. Neuroskeptic is a British neuroscientist ontporing takes a skeptical look duederik his own field, and beyond.